- This topic has 93 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated June 17, 2009 at 6:03 pm by ketordeath.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 12, 2009 at 3:32 pm #1201264Iacchus;333398 wrote:with the fetishes tho they both enjoyed it and wanted it (presumably) so it doesnt count 😛
I dunno man, If someone cut my cock off i doubt i’d enjoy it.
June 12, 2009 at 3:38 pm #1201322@DJCliffy 333403 wrote:
I dunno man, If someone cut my cock off i doubt i’d enjoy it.
ah but you dont have a my-cock-being-eaten fetish do you :weee:..
my ex used to love pain of a sexual nature and i understood it to some extent.. I doubt any fetish exists where you dont actually enjoy itJune 12, 2009 at 4:02 pm #1201265Iacchus;333410 wrote:ah but you dont have a my-cock-being-eaten fetish do you :weee:..
my ex used to love pain of a sexual nature and i understood it to some extent.. I doubt any fetish exists where you dont actually enjoy itWell i don’t mind it being sucked, probably as far as i go as per the cuisine aspect.
I image the fetish which involves eating another persons poo poo wouldn’t be very enjoyable, specially if they had the dereks. :yakk:
June 13, 2009 at 9:20 am #1201254@Iacchus 333387 wrote:
Fair enough.. I agree there are a lot of grey areas in life that require a personal decision but I still think there is fundamental good and fundamental evil in the universe.
For example causing another person suffering merely for your own entertainment (ie bullying, raping, torturing animals or even people) is my definition of a fundamental universal evil. Surely nobody can argue that is a matter of opinion?
You gotta ask yourself what drove these people to do the horrible things they did. Were they evil or were they misinformed? Are the african kids who are forced to do attrocious things by their captors evil? When they grow up to think that their behaviour is correct and justified, are they evil then? Are their captors evil for instilling such evil thoughts into the yout’ or are they merely the product of a failed society?
China stopped being a feudal society when one leader wiped out all of their enemies and achieved nationwide peace. Was he a demon for all the killing/raping/torture that he initiated or was he an angel for the thousands of years of peace that he initiated?
June 13, 2009 at 9:24 am #1201255@p0lygon-Window 333364 wrote:
Here’s another question I have. How come when it’s us, it’s an abortion, and when it’s a chicken, it’s an omelette? Are we so much better than chickens all of a sudden? When did this happen, that we passed chickens in goodness. Name 6 ways we’re better than chickens. See, nobody can do it! You know why? ‘Cause chickens are decent people. You don’t see chickens hanging around in drug gangs, do you? No, you don’t see a chicken strapping some guy into a chair and hooking up his nuts to a car battery, do you? When’s the last chicken you heard about come home from work and beat the shit out of his hen, huh? Doesn’t happen, ’cause chickens are decent people.
– George CarlinChickens havent invented batteries yet, but they can be evil rapist bastards and when they kick off its not a nice experience.
Lots of animals do exceptionally evil things without a second thought – even chimps are bullies, rapists, torturers and murderers… or at least they are capable of ‘evil’ acts.
June 15, 2009 at 8:44 am #1201323@TEK Tonic 333520 wrote:
You gotta ask yourself what drove these people to do the horrible things they did. Were they evil or were they misinformed? Are the african kids who are forced to do attrocious things by their captors evil? When they grow up to think that their behaviour is correct and justified, are they evil then? Are their captors evil for instilling such evil thoughts into the yout’ or are they merely the product of a failed society?
China stopped being a feudal society when one leader wiped out all of their enemies and achieved nationwide peace. Was he a demon for all the killing/raping/torture that he initiated or was he an angel for the thousands of years of peace that he initiated?
Can’t comment really on african children being forced to do things, but generally there is always a choice, even if it is a hard choice. People have a responsibility to think about their actions and their orders, and if they don’t then they dont deserve the label of sentient beings in my book.
When it comes to things like torture the ends never justify the means. No amount of lives saved in an excuse for torturing someone else. If you can think up one scenario where it is justified to torture someone then anyone can justify anything. If you believe otherwise you are part of the problem with humanity.June 15, 2009 at 2:02 pm #1201285torture someone to get the code to stop a nuclear warhead killing loads of people?
June 15, 2009 at 2:13 pm #1201256Don’t get me wrong – I’m not trying to justify torture, I just think people generally behave how they see fit based on their own ideas of what is right and what is wrong. These ideas could only have come from experience and some of those experiences will have been horrific and others will have been misinterpreted.
I don’t think people are evil, I think they sometimes act and think in horrible ways but they are only acting and thinking the best way they know how.
“Forgive them because they know not what they do”
(And I have a right chip on my shoulder about organised religion!!)June 15, 2009 at 3:27 pm #1201324@p0lygon-Window 333772 wrote:
torture someone to get the code to stop a nuclear warhead killing loads of people?
No amount of lives makes it ok. Otherwise you can use the same logic to justify torturing anyone to save any amount of lives, and everything the US government has been doing with prisoners of war is totally justified and moral. Either torture is ok or it isnt. And it isnt.
June 15, 2009 at 3:30 pm #1201325@TEK Tonic 333779 wrote:
Don’t get me wrong – I’m not trying to justify torture, I just think people generally behave how they see fit based on their own ideas of what is right and what is wrong. These ideas could only have come from experience and some of those experiences will have been horrific and others will have been misinterpreted.
I don’t think people are evil, I think they sometimes act and think in horrible ways but they are only acting and thinking the best way they know how.
“Forgive them because they know not what they do”
(And I have a right chip on my shoulder about organised religion!!)Yeah I can understand why people do things if that is the way they were brought up, peer pressure and norms of society etc, however that does not excuse people of their actions. Otherwise again Nazi concentration camp workers etc can use the ‘everyone was doing it’ argument.
I’d say if someone does something like torturing someone because they were ordered to but did not like doing it, they just are just immoral cowards for not fighting the order. If they actualy enjoy it they are evil.
June 15, 2009 at 3:53 pm #1201297the definition of evil comes within the restriction of emotion
at the end of the day, what is evil.
it is what is percieved as a pinpoint, focused bunch of negative emotions such of that of disgust and sorrow.evil is an emotional reaction and state of mind, it however is not a single entity, ‘evil’ comes under a manner of guises, such as do positive emotions such as happiness.
It is not a noun.
June 15, 2009 at 3:56 pm #1201257Not trying to justify it but…
Apparently ‘most’ people will actually administer a fatal electric shock to somebody if they are told to do so by someone with enough authority:
Milgram experiment – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I would say that somebody who did so despite their own moral objections is weak-willed and cowardly but only human, if they enjoyed it (and apparently spite is not uncommon in humans either Are humans cruel to be kind? – life – 16 May 2009 – New Scientist) then they are probably more fucked up than most, have a warped sense of what is fun… but are still only human, not evil (IMHO).
June 15, 2009 at 4:00 pm #1201298when you say warped sense of fun
as i said, fun is also just an emotion…
perhaps you perceive it as warped because society has laid down what is sane and what is not, to keep you within the boundaries.
its all just emotion.. people are made happy in all manner of ways
some have explored the forbidden realms formed by society and found new ways of fun that suit them
June 15, 2009 at 4:04 pm #1201258@joshd96320 333807 wrote:
when you say warped sense of fun
as i said, fun is also just an emotion…
perhaps you perceive it as warped because society has laid down what is sane and what is not, to keep you within the boundaries.
its all just emotion.. people are made happy in all manner of ways
some have explored the forbidden realms formed by society and found new ways of fun that suit them
Like doing SnM on each other… or hunting foxes with dogs who tear the fox appart before the humans dip their fingers in the blood and smear it on their childrens’ faces… or making some fuckin’ noise and pissing the neighbours off, shitting in their garden and leaving a skipload of rubbish lying around for them to pick up? 😉
June 15, 2009 at 4:07 pm #1201299some people find it fun
i dont
but some do
emotions init :pJune 15, 2009 at 4:08 pm #1201259Exactly =)
June 15, 2009 at 4:10 pm #1201300=]
im not saying i like it im just saying that society has laid down a good control on emotion and through this most stuff can be controlled. i dont like the way that works with a minor party in control so i accept how some people find ‘different’ stuff pleasuring.. i accept it and dont label them as total nutters, though i wouldnt want them doing it to me, i just dont handle it the way im expected to by stating theyre psychotic and need locking up
June 15, 2009 at 4:34 pm #1201286Iacchus;333790 wrote:No amount of lives makes it ok. Otherwise you can use the same logic to justify torturing anyone to save any amount of lives, and everything the US government has been doing with prisoners of war is totally justified and moral. Either torture is ok or it isnt. And it isnt.so no one deserves to be tortured even if they are a complete evil cunt who wants to fire a nuclear warhead at a country?
i see you have your mind made up but to be honest i think the cunt would be needed to be tortured to stop it from happening
June 15, 2009 at 8:10 pm #1201266p0lygon-Window;333818 wrote:so no one deserves to be tortured even if they are a complete evil cunt who wants to fire a nuclear warhead at a country?i see you have your mind made up but to be honest i think the cunt would be needed to be tortured to stop it from happening
I agree. If someone had planted a nuke in a major city and the only way you could find out was by torturing that person i’d do it or give the order for them to be. Then again it would have to be a last and final resort. People being tortured for no reason or for ‘fun’ is not cool at all. But then if someone is going to cause major destruction on your countrymen you ain’t got no choice.
June 16, 2009 at 7:46 am #1201260@DJCliffy 333868 wrote:
I agree. If someone had planted a nuke in a major city and the only way you could find out was by torturing that person i’d do it or give the order for them to be. Then again it would have to be a last and final resort. People being tortured for no reason or for ‘fun’ is not cool at all. But then if someone is going to cause major destruction on your countrymen you ain’t got no choice.
What if you gave the order and the best man for the job was somebody who quite enjoys torturing people? Is it OK for him to enjoy his work now that he is going to save the world with his nasty ways?
June 16, 2009 at 7:49 am #1201287then you would be killing two birds with one stone, torture the evil cunt and let the other evil cunt enjoy it!!
June 16, 2009 at 8:36 am #1201326@p0lygon-Window 333818 wrote:
so no one deserves to be tortured even if they are a complete evil cunt who wants to fire a nuclear warhead at a country?
i see you have your mind made up but to be honest i think the cunt would be needed to be tortured to stop it from happening
absolutely, if you want to torture him you are just as bad as he is and you are both equally part of the problem with humanity
June 16, 2009 at 8:46 am #1201327@joshd96320 333801 wrote:
the definition of evil comes within the restriction of emotion
at the end of the day, what is evil.
it is what is percieved as a pinpoint, focused bunch of negative emotions such of that of disgust and sorrow.evil is an emotional reaction and state of mind, it however is not a single entity, ‘evil’ comes under a manner of guises, such as do positive emotions such as happiness.
It is not a noun.
Evil is both an adjective or a noun depending on the context
evil definition | Dictionary.com
Saying evil exists only as the emotional reaction inside peoples minds isnt strictly true because an act that people would consider evil can happen and be completely unobserved. Is the act no longer evil because nobody has observed it?
June 16, 2009 at 10:07 am #1201301@Iacchus 334004 wrote:
Evil is both an adjective or a noun depending on the context
evil definition | Dictionary.com
Saying evil exists only as the emotional reaction inside peoples minds isnt strictly true because an act that people would consider evil can happen and be completely unobserved. Is the act no longer evil because nobody has observed it?
i would still say its just an emotion… people arent the only creatures with emotion. i see what you mean as in the.. if a tree falls down in a forest but nobody is there is it heard?
I would say yes it is still heard or felt.
By our definitions set within emotion we would perceive said act as evil.of course the term evil can be used as an adjective such as this ‘evil chair’ or whatever.
but i think it is just an emotion.. if we didnt see torture as evil then we wouldnt describe it as evil, therefore it is the impact of our emotions that defines what is ‘evil’
June 16, 2009 at 1:02 pm #1201288Iacchus;334002 wrote:absolutely, if you want to torture him you are just as bad as he is and you are both equally part of the problem with humanityopinions opinions
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.