This topic contains 460 replies, has 24 voices, and was last updated by 
LunaStorm November 10, 2007 at 11:37 am.
- AuthorPosts
- October 18, 2007 at 6:06 pm #1122724
I Adore
Do you believe in ghosts?
October 18, 2007 at 6:06 pm #1143614I Adore
Do you believe in ghosts?
October 18, 2007 at 6:37 pm #1122882Not ghosts but i dont think there is something else there….
How many milimetres are there between your right and left eye?
October 18, 2007 at 6:37 pm #1143782Not ghosts but i dont think there is something else there….
How many milimetres are there between your right and left eye?
October 18, 2007 at 7:11 pm #1122695Hazza88 wrote:Not ghosts but i dont think there is something else there….How many milimetres are there between your right and left eye?
10 ?
October 18, 2007 at 7:11 pm #1143584Hazza88 wrote:Not ghosts but i dont think there is something else there….How many milimetres are there between your right and left eye?
10 ?
October 18, 2007 at 7:12 pm #1122696Imagine an aircraft is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and it intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation. There is no wind. Can the aircraft take off?
Hazza88 wrote:Yeah the engines provide the thrust, not the wheels. So as long as the wheels can roll as fast the plane needs for take-off speed plus the speed of the conveyer belt, then it will go. :bounce_g::bounce_g::bounce_g:This is wrong why?
October 18, 2007 at 7:12 pm #1143585Imagine an aircraft is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and it intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation. There is no wind. Can the aircraft take off?
Hazza88 wrote:Yeah the engines provide the thrust, not the wheels. So as long as the wheels can roll as fast the plane needs for take-off speed plus the speed of the conveyer belt, then it will go. :bounce_g::bounce_g::bounce_g:This is wrong why?
October 18, 2007 at 7:55 pm #1122828djprocess wrote:Imagine an aircraft is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and it intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation. There is no wind. Can the aircraft take off?This is wrong why?
What is this? The Krypton Factor?
Don’t see why the aircraft cant take off, uplift is created by the air moving over the wings is it not?
October 18, 2007 at 7:55 pm #1143724djprocess wrote:Imagine an aircraft is sat on the beginning of a massive conveyor belt/travelator type arrangement, as wide and as long as a runway, and it intends to take off. The conveyer belt is designed to exactly match the speed of the wheels at any given time, moving in the opposite direction of rotation. There is no wind. Can the aircraft take off?This is wrong why?
What is this? The Krypton Factor?
Don’t see why the aircraft cant take off, uplift is created by the air moving over the wings is it not?
October 18, 2007 at 9:11 pm #1122697Because the plane wouldnt move forward because the conveyor belt is going in the opposite direction to the wheels. So the plane would still be at a stand still, even tho its wheels may be moving, which would mean that there would be no moving air over the wings to create uplift. (or so someone told me:wink: )
Is jeremy Kyle a complete tit?
October 18, 2007 at 9:11 pm #1143586Because the plane wouldnt move forward because the conveyor belt is going in the opposite direction to the wheels. So the plane would still be at a stand still, even tho its wheels may be moving, which would mean that there would be no moving air over the wings to create uplift. (or so someone told me:wink: )
Is jeremy Kyle a complete tit?
October 18, 2007 at 9:24 pm #1122883djprocess wrote:Because the plane wouldnt move forward because the conveyor belt is going in the opposite direction to the wheels. So the plane would still be at a stand still, even tho its wheels may be moving, which would mean that there would be no moving air over the wings to create uplift. (or so someone told me:wink: )Is jeremy Kyle a complete tit?
No hes wicked,
Does ricky lakes jaw look like shes just taken about 5 or 6 pills?
October 18, 2007 at 9:24 pm #1143783djprocess wrote:Because the plane wouldnt move forward because the conveyor belt is going in the opposite direction to the wheels. So the plane would still be at a stand still, even tho its wheels may be moving, which would mean that there would be no moving air over the wings to create uplift. (or so someone told me:wink: )Is jeremy Kyle a complete tit?
No hes wicked,
Does ricky lakes jaw look like shes just taken about 5 or 6 pills?
October 18, 2007 at 9:25 pm #1122864yes
are you human
October 18, 2007 at 9:25 pm #1143763yes
are you human
October 18, 2007 at 9:26 pm #1122829vaguely
where’s your favourite place (outside)?
October 18, 2007 at 9:26 pm #1143726vaguely
where’s your favourite place (outside)?
October 18, 2007 at 9:28 pm #1122725Forest
Can you swim?
October 18, 2007 at 9:28 pm #1143615Forest
Can you swim?
October 18, 2007 at 9:29 pm #1122830like a fish
how old were you when you lost your virginity?
October 18, 2007 at 9:29 pm #1143727like a fish
how old were you when you lost your virginity?
October 18, 2007 at 9:31 pm #112272615 I think -whistle-
are you working tomorrow?
October 18, 2007 at 9:31 pm #114361615 I think -whistle-
are you working tomorrow?
October 18, 2007 at 9:33 pm #1122831not strictly
does size matter?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.