Forums The Vibe Chat Gordo sends a message

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 57 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1161415
    Digital-A
    Participant

    :laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at:

    how long did you spend on that DF?

    #1219279
    Digital-A
    Participant

    :laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at:

    how long did you spend on that DF?

    #1161425
    DaftFader
    Participant
    Digital-A wrote:
    :laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at:

    how long did you spend on that DF?

    bout 5 mins lol :wink::laugh_at:

    #1219288
    DaftFader
    Participant
    Digital-A wrote:
    :laugh_at: :laugh_at: :laugh_at:

    how long did you spend on that DF?

    bout 5 mins lol :wink::laugh_at:

    #1161416
    Digital-A
    Participant

    computers confuse me … paint is just another brick in the wall and the technology that surrounds the internet recieving tower that is my dell … p.v and media player are about all i can manage!

    least some of us have got talent though eh!? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    #1219280
    Digital-A
    Participant

    computers confuse me … paint is just another brick in the wall and the technology that surrounds the internet recieving tower that is my dell … p.v and media player are about all i can manage!

    least some of us have got talent though eh!? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    #1161426
    DaftFader
    Participant
    Digital-A wrote:
    computers confuse me … paint is just another brick in the wall and the technology that surrounds the internet recieving tower that is my dell … p.v and media player are about all i can manage!

    least some of us have got talent though eh!? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    lol .. i used to draw pics with spliffs like that all the time when i used to smoke weed … all i did was get that pic up in paint and move my mouse where i would of drawn the lines with a pen back in the day :laugh_at: ..dont really need that much tallent .. but i am glad you apreciate it ๐Ÿ˜‰

    #1219289
    DaftFader
    Participant
    Digital-A wrote:
    computers confuse me … paint is just another brick in the wall and the technology that surrounds the internet recieving tower that is my dell … p.v and media player are about all i can manage!

    least some of us have got talent though eh!? ๐Ÿ˜‰

    lol .. i used to draw pics with spliffs like that all the time when i used to smoke weed … all i did was get that pic up in paint and move my mouse where i would of drawn the lines with a pen back in the day :laugh_at: ..dont really need that much tallent .. but i am glad you apreciate it ๐Ÿ˜‰

    #1161417
    Digital-A
    Participant

    without people like you my dear lad this world would be unliveable …

    #1219281
    Digital-A
    Participant

    without people like you my dear lad this world would be unliveable …

    #1161427
    DaftFader
    Participant

    :love:

    Digital-A wrote:
    without people like you my dear lad this world would be unliveable …

    :love:

    #1219290
    DaftFader
    Participant

    :love:

    Digital-A wrote:
    without people like you my dear lad this world would be unliveable …

    :love:

    #1161428
    Pike Tom Us
    Participant

    ket definatly needs to be moved up.. no way should it be along side weed. and neither should G. come to think of it Shrooms shouldnt be class A either..

    #1219291
    Pike Tom Us
    Participant

    ket definatly needs to be moved up.. no way should it be along side weed. and neither should G. come to think of it Shrooms shouldnt be class A either..

    #1161412
    MisterDuck
    Participant
    smokeitup wrote:
    ket definatly needs to be moved up.. no way should it be along side weed. and neither should G. come to think of it Shrooms shouldnt be class A either..

    what’s G? GHB?

    The drug classification system is all over the place, quite frankly. There is no way ecstasy should be class A, for a start. It is outdated and has no scientific or social basis at all.

    #1219276
    MisterDuck
    Participant
    smokeitup wrote:
    ket definatly needs to be moved up.. no way should it be along side weed. and neither should G. come to think of it Shrooms shouldnt be class A either..

    what’s G? GHB?

    The drug classification system is all over the place, quite frankly. There is no way ecstasy should be class A, for a start. It is outdated and has no scientific or social basis at all.

    #1161429
    Pike Tom Us
    Participant

    yup GHB.. with the potential to kill you. its a fine line between it getting you high and killing you. alot more riskier that shrooms or even MDMA. yet its alongside weed and tranquilizers..

    i heard the classification system was in order of the potential of abuse and how harmful it is. like say heroin should definatly be class A coz of the addiction thing and how bad it is for your body..

    #1219292
    Pike Tom Us
    Participant

    yup GHB.. with the potential to kill you. its a fine line between it getting you high and killing you. alot more riskier that shrooms or even MDMA. yet its alongside weed and tranquilizers..

    i heard the classification system was in order of the potential of abuse and how harmful it is. like say heroin should definatly be class A coz of the addiction thing and how bad it is for your body..

    #1161408
    General Lighting
    Moderator

    sometimes I think they aren’t as stupid as you think though and its a lot more cynical and calculating

    making ket class A or B would mean many dealers would think “better be hanged for a sheep than a lamb” and start importing dealing decent pills and speed again

    and if GHB kills people once they are dead they are no further burden to the NHS…

    now at this point this is slight “tinfoil helmet” territory but I also think that the right wing would be perfectly happy for certain junkies or other non-productive people to be able to easily end their lifes either accidentally or deliberately so they leave at least one “killer” drug easily available..

    #1219272
    General Lighting
    Moderator

    sometimes I think they aren’t as stupid as you think though and its a lot more cynical and calculating

    making ket class A or B would mean many dealers would think “better be hanged for a sheep than a lamb” and start importing dealing decent pills and speed again

    and if GHB kills people once they are dead they are no further burden to the NHS…

    now at this point this is slight “tinfoil helmet” territory but I also think that the right wing would be perfectly happy for certain junkies or other non-productive people to be able to easily end their lifes either accidentally or deliberately so they leave at least one “killer” drug easily available..

    #1161413
    MisterDuck
    Participant
    smokeitup wrote:
    yup GHB.. with the potential to kill you. its a fine line between it getting you high and killing you. alot more riskier that shrooms or even MDMA. yet its alongside weed and tranquilizers..

    i heard the classification system was in order of the potential of abuse and how harmful it is. like say heroin should definatly be class A coz of the addiction thing and how bad it is for your body..

    Nah mate. It’s not based on any particular order. It’s mostly “put everything in class A” when it becomes a problem, and very rarely move it down if the government frankly has no other choice.

    For example:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5230006.stm

    The designation of drugs in classes A, B and C should be replaced with one more closely reflecting the harm they cause, a committee of MPs has said. The Science Select Committee said the present system was based on historical assumptions, not scientific assessment.

    Perhaps most surprising is the presence of two Class A drugs – ecstasy and LSD – in the bottom six.”
    _41949092_drugs_graph_416.gif

    I’m not saying that everyone will agree with that graph (for one, it does not separate coke and crack) but it proves the classification system is a load of outdated shit.

    #1219277
    MisterDuck
    Participant
    smokeitup wrote:
    yup GHB.. with the potential to kill you. its a fine line between it getting you high and killing you. alot more riskier that shrooms or even MDMA. yet its alongside weed and tranquilizers..

    i heard the classification system was in order of the potential of abuse and how harmful it is. like say heroin should definatly be class A coz of the addiction thing and how bad it is for your body..

    Nah mate. It’s not based on any particular order. It’s mostly “put everything in class A” when it becomes a problem, and very rarely move it down if the government frankly has no other choice.

    For example:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5230006.stm

    The designation of drugs in classes A, B and C should be replaced with one more closely reflecting the harm they cause, a committee of MPs has said. The Science Select Committee said the present system was based on historical assumptions, not scientific assessment.

    Perhaps most surprising is the presence of two Class A drugs – ecstasy and LSD – in the bottom six.”
    _41949092_drugs_graph_416.gif

    I’m not saying that everyone will agree with that graph (for one, it does not separate coke and crack) but it proves the classification system is a load of outdated shit.

    #1161409
    General Lighting
    Moderator
    boothy wrote:
    Nah mate. It’s not based on any particular order. It’s mostly “put everything in class A” when it becomes a problem, and very rarely move it down if the government frankly has no other choice.

    yep thats the other side of the coin

    if MDMA went class B we would be flooded with it, might be fun for ravers in the short term until the proper old skool comedowns set in (was why a lot of people today are bang into benzos, ket or even smack)

    Quote:

    I’m not saying that everyone will agree with that graph (for one, it does not separate coke and crack) but it proves the classification system is a load of outdated shit.

    there may be good reasons for it, even “normal” coke snorters occasionally wash up a rock or two. also its not really any different from Senior Service cigarettes (high tar cigs what may even be banned today) compared to Mayfair lights, both are classed as tobacco..

    oh, and gordon brown always looks stoned because he only has one eye. the other is glass.

    #1219273
    General Lighting
    Moderator
    boothy wrote:
    Nah mate. It’s not based on any particular order. It’s mostly “put everything in class A” when it becomes a problem, and very rarely move it down if the government frankly has no other choice.

    yep thats the other side of the coin

    if MDMA went class B we would be flooded with it, might be fun for ravers in the short term until the proper old skool comedowns set in (was why a lot of people today are bang into benzos, ket or even smack)

    Quote:

    I’m not saying that everyone will agree with that graph (for one, it does not separate coke and crack) but it proves the classification system is a load of outdated shit.

    there may be good reasons for it, even “normal” coke snorters occasionally wash up a rock or two. also its not really any different from Senior Service cigarettes (high tar cigs what may even be banned today) compared to Mayfair lights, both are classed as tobacco..

    oh, and gordon brown always looks stoned because he only has one eye. the other is glass.

    #1161414
    MisterDuck
    Participant

    Got it playing rugby dint he. I thought he was a working class kid!

Viewing 25 posts - 26 through 50 (of 57 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums The Vibe Chat Gordo sends a message