Forums The Vibe Chat Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 101 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1117021
    quietRIOT
    Participant

    glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    #1137680
    quietRIOT
    Participant

    glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    #1117020
    harmlessfeet
    Participant
    april wrote:
    he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    case closed. :rolleyes:

    #1137679
    harmlessfeet
    Participant
    april wrote:
    he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    case closed. :rolleyes:

    #1117057
    tilting
    Participant
    Gott wrote:
    One thing that is going to be quite worrying is the arrival of new laws that make it illegal to look at or download stuff that is technically level 5 but is actually consensual..

    I know that it’s causing quite some concern in the S&M/Fetish scene given that a lot of the stuff that is passe to them could quite easily have jurors in tears.. but, it is consensual and that is the problem, one person’s meat being another’s poison..

    The worrying thing is that in the name of protecting the innocent we could end up criminalising people and having ludicrous situations like the Bolton Seven again..

    Well, it’s Level 1-5 (what does your ‘technically’ actually mean?) only if it involves children. And children can’t give consent, as you’re no doubt aware. If it’s adults, then it doesn’t qualify as child pornography full stop and as such wouldn’t be classified as 1-5.

    I know about the concern amongst S&M-ers too, but I seriously doubt anyone would ever be convicted when consent could be proven, no matter how upsetting the material.

    Bolton 7 were undoubtedly victimised for their homosexuality rather than S&M antics. And it all got overturned in the end, thus setting the precedent which will discourage any future silliness like that.

    #1137718
    tilting
    Participant
    Gott wrote:
    One thing that is going to be quite worrying is the arrival of new laws that make it illegal to look at or download stuff that is technically level 5 but is actually consensual..

    I know that it’s causing quite some concern in the S&M/Fetish scene given that a lot of the stuff that is passe to them could quite easily have jurors in tears.. but, it is consensual and that is the problem, one person’s meat being another’s poison..

    The worrying thing is that in the name of protecting the innocent we could end up criminalising people and having ludicrous situations like the Bolton Seven again..

    Well, it’s Level 1-5 (what does your ‘technically’ actually mean?) only if it involves children. And children can’t give consent, as you’re no doubt aware. If it’s adults, then it doesn’t qualify as child pornography full stop and as such wouldn’t be classified as 1-5.

    I know about the concern amongst S&M-ers too, but I seriously doubt anyone would ever be convicted when consent could be proven, no matter how upsetting the material.

    Bolton 7 were undoubtedly victimised for their homosexuality rather than S&M antics. And it all got overturned in the end, thus setting the precedent which will discourage any future silliness like that.

    #1117022
    quietRIOT
    Participant

    erm …bit more too it than that if you read ALL the post….derrr 😉 :crazy_diz

    #1137681
    quietRIOT
    Participant

    erm …bit more too it than that if you read ALL the post….derrr 😉 :crazy_diz

    #1117058
    tilting
    Participant
    april wrote:
    glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    Yeah fuckin sick fucks string em up hangings too good for em.

    Canyoustayoutofthisthreadfromnowonpleasethanks.

    #1137719
    tilting
    Participant
    april wrote:
    glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    Yeah fuckin sick fucks string em up hangings too good for em.

    Canyoustayoutofthisthreadfromnowonpleasethanks.

    #1117060
    SJ Refugee
    Participant
    april wrote:
    ….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …

    AND THEY WERE BOTH NONSES!

    I can see a pattern forming…

    #1137721
    SJ Refugee
    Participant
    april wrote:
    ….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …

    AND THEY WERE BOTH NONSES!

    I can see a pattern forming…

    #1117023
    quietRIOT
    Participant

    you can see it too,..:weee: CooL

    #1137682
    quietRIOT
    Participant

    you can see it too,..:weee: CooL

    #1117061
    SJ Refugee
    Participant
    april wrote:
    you can see it too,..:weee: CooL

    Is that a child’s arse in your avatar April?

    #1137722
    SJ Refugee
    Participant
    april wrote:
    you can see it too,..:weee: CooL

    Is that a child’s arse in your avatar April?

    #1117062
    fluffywuffyflump
    Participant
    april wrote:
    glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    I CAN’T BELIEVE YOU ARE A TEACHING ASSISTANT

    I HAVE NEVER SEEN YOU SPELL A WORD RIGHT

    FREEWAY WHERES MY FUCKING FIVER YOU FUCKER 😉

    #1137723
    fluffywuffyflump
    Participant
    april wrote:
    glad he has been charged the lieing bastard…..shame pete townsend who did exact same thing didnt get made a example an be locked up…..but i guess he paid off the judge or something….he looks like a nonse …so does this actor bloke……..sic fuks …should hang them …..raaa

    I CAN’T BELIEVE YOU ARE A TEACHING ASSISTANT

    I HAVE NEVER SEEN YOU SPELL A WORD RIGHT

    FREEWAY WHERES MY FUCKING FIVER YOU FUCKER 😉

    #1117048
    Intastella
    Participant
    april wrote:
    erm …bit more too it than that if you read ALL the post….derrr 😉 :crazy_diz

    Well, there’s more actual letters in it than was quoted…is that what you mean?

    #1137708
    Intastella
    Participant
    april wrote:
    erm …bit more too it than that if you read ALL the post….derrr 😉 :crazy_diz

    Well, there’s more actual letters in it than was quoted…is that what you mean?

    #1117016
    Col
    Participant
    andy ridgeway wrote:
    i remember there was some tv awards ceremony shortly after langham’s initial arrest, and The Thick Of It were nominated in some category.

    they read out the other 5 shows that were nominated to rapturous applause, but the words The Thick Of It were greeted with utter, stony silence, the camera cut to the cast and crew members who looks shocked and deeply embarrassed.

    i wonder if any one had clapped whether they would have been bottled out of the room to shrieks of noncelover!

    re: rebuilding your career after something like this, i dunno, pete townsend seems to be doing ok by just Pretending It Never Happened, but if you’ve actually done prison time for it the options seem to be move to thailand, or brazen it out as a celebrity nonce, a la Jonathon King.

    there is still something that makes me uneasy about sending people to prison for looking at an image on a computer screen though, it is a touch ThoughtCrime, isn’t it? i understand the arguments regarding the corrupting nature of the material and that without a market for it, it wouldn’t exist.

    but at the same time, i’ve seen some terrible stuff (none paedophile related, i hurry to add!) on the internet, like russian soldiers being decapitated for instance.

    does having viewed that material make me a murderer? should i do prison time for murder?

    You raise a very good point there.

    #1137675
    Col
    Participant
    andy ridgeway wrote:
    i remember there was some tv awards ceremony shortly after langham’s initial arrest, and The Thick Of It were nominated in some category.

    they read out the other 5 shows that were nominated to rapturous applause, but the words The Thick Of It were greeted with utter, stony silence, the camera cut to the cast and crew members who looks shocked and deeply embarrassed.

    i wonder if any one had clapped whether they would have been bottled out of the room to shrieks of noncelover!

    re: rebuilding your career after something like this, i dunno, pete townsend seems to be doing ok by just Pretending It Never Happened, but if you’ve actually done prison time for it the options seem to be move to thailand, or brazen it out as a celebrity nonce, a la Jonathon King.

    there is still something that makes me uneasy about sending people to prison for looking at an image on a computer screen though, it is a touch ThoughtCrime, isn’t it? i understand the arguments regarding the corrupting nature of the material and that without a market for it, it wouldn’t exist.

    but at the same time, i’ve seen some terrible stuff (none paedophile related, i hurry to add!) on the internet, like russian soldiers being decapitated for instance.

    does having viewed that material make me a murderer? should i do prison time for murder?

    You raise a very good point there.

    #1117049
    Intastella
    Participant
    andy ridgeway wrote:
    there is still something that makes me uneasy about sending people to prison for looking at an image on a computer screen though, it is a touch ThoughtCrime, isn’t it? i understand the arguments regarding the corrupting nature of the material and that without a market for it, it wouldn’t exist.

    but at the same time, i’ve seen some terrible stuff (none paedophile related, i hurry to add!) on the internet, like russian soldiers being decapitated for instance.

    does having viewed that material make me a murderer? should i do prison time for murder?

    I think the difference is there that people aren’t specifically setting out to murder someone for someone elses viewing pleasure or sexual gratification. If they did, that would make it a snuff film, wouldn’t it? And i think the general concensus is that snuff (and by that i mean proper snuff, not just footage of someone being shot or whatever) is a bit of an urban myth.

    It doesn’t make you responsible for that persons death, just makes you a bit of a wrongun ;op

    #1137709
    Intastella
    Participant
    andy ridgeway wrote:
    there is still something that makes me uneasy about sending people to prison for looking at an image on a computer screen though, it is a touch ThoughtCrime, isn’t it? i understand the arguments regarding the corrupting nature of the material and that without a market for it, it wouldn’t exist.

    but at the same time, i’ve seen some terrible stuff (none paedophile related, i hurry to add!) on the internet, like russian soldiers being decapitated for instance.

    does having viewed that material make me a murderer? should i do prison time for murder?

    I think the difference is there that people aren’t specifically setting out to murder someone for someone elses viewing pleasure or sexual gratification. If they did, that would make it a snuff film, wouldn’t it? And i think the general concensus is that snuff (and by that i mean proper snuff, not just footage of someone being shot or whatever) is a bit of an urban myth.

    It doesn’t make you responsible for that persons death, just makes you a bit of a wrongun ;op

    #1117014
    JE5
    Participant

    He’s a bent ref, he’s a shrub rocketeer, he’s a buntyman, he’s a small bean regarder, he’s the crazy world of Arthur Brown.

Viewing 25 posts - 76 through 100 (of 101 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Forums The Vibe Chat Chris Langham Guilty of Downloading Child Porn