April 15, 2006 at 8:15 pm #1037497MeParticipant
??April 15, 2006 at 8:16 pm #1069994ColParticipant
some tithead was DOSing the server and the host got pissed off so they need to find a new host
wont be back until mid next week earliestApril 15, 2006 at 8:17 pm #1070005MeParticipant
seenApril 15, 2006 at 8:21 pm #1069989April 15, 2006 at 8:49 pm #1070004bumpkinbeansParticipant
at least now they can,t rip the piss out of us from norfolk .what are all the clickey crew that frequent s juice gonna do now ??some of them live on there 24 seven .April 15, 2006 at 9:05 pm #1069993General LightingModerator
that norfolk slating is way out of hand – started as a joke but these things go way too far as when people argue they forget their security and say things that help cops find out who is doing what.
its very worrying though that anyone takes an argument so far to essentially get a site closed down –
its odd and rather suspicious though that SJ gets knocked out over a big weekend for ravers….I wonder if its anti-rave vigilantés? farmers and landowners use the net as well…April 18, 2006 at 5:46 pm #1070008
How the fek did slating Norfolkers get the site kicked off the server?
:toxic:VOTE LABOURApril 18, 2006 at 5:50 pm #1070017dan uParticipantCT23 wrote:How the fek did slating Norfolkers get the site kicked off the server?
shagging family members and assorted animals and broadcasting it via webcam
allegedlyApril 18, 2006 at 5:59 pm #1070011random-raverParticipantMe!!! wrote:??
Murderation…..:toxic:April 18, 2006 at 6:00 pm #1070003K_trinaParticipantSite wrote:
i DNT HAVE THAT COMMING UP…IT GIVES ME A PAGE WITH ALL DIFFERENT FILES i CNA GO INTO.April 18, 2006 at 6:06 pm #1069997djvuParticipant
I recon one of these hilly billys sent a carrier pigion to a internet cafe, in a city more civalised city than there own and this pigion hopped about and sent bare spam and feathers towards sj towers and gave it a dose of bird fluApril 18, 2006 at 6:07 pm #1069998djvuParticipant
its odd and rather suspicious though that SJ gets knocked out over a big weekend for ravers….I wonder if its anti-rave vigilantés? farmers and landowners use the net as well…
I did think that toApril 18, 2006 at 6:13 pm #1070016clackstaanParticipantdjvu wrote:I recon one of these hilly billys sent a carrier pigion to a internet cafe, in a city more civalised city than there own and this pigion hopped about and sent bare spam and feathers towards sj towers and gave it a dose of bird flu
bare spamApril 18, 2006 at 6:20 pm #1069992JE5Participantdjvu wrote:its odd and rather suspicious though that SJ gets knocked out over a big weekend for ravers….I wonder if its anti-rave vigilantés? farmers and landowners use the net as well…
I did think that to
Or pigs..April 18, 2006 at 6:20 pm #1069999TigerMoffParticipantCT23 wrote:How the fek did slating Norfolkers get the site kicked off the server?
I dont believe it had much to do with Norfolk but this is the defination of DOS attacks:
Short for denial-of-service attack, a type of attack on a network that is designed to bring the network to its knees by flooding it with useless traffic. For all known DoS attacks, there are software fixes that system administrators can install to limit the damage caused by the attacks.
The comany who owns the server prolly got pissed off with their server going down again and told SJ that they didnt want their custom anymore. IT may have affected other customers such as companies who would be a little pissed off thier website was down.April 18, 2006 at 6:25 pm #1070000TigerMoffParticipantJE:5 wrote:Or pigs..
I believe the server is not located in this country so the OB wont have the authority to bring it down. I doubt if they would want to. Its prolly their best resource for illegal parties, tho recently the gallery has been removed and most rigs don’t post their parties in the announcements section.
SJ really has become too popular for its own good.
I think it was just one of the numpties who knows how to hack got a good ripping off SJ and decided to bring it down.April 18, 2006 at 6:33 pm #1070009
Duz any1 know 4 sure?
I thought maybe the admin had removed it becoz of the bankholday weekend partys/ legal stuff ect
This place looks more randomly fun I think
HtMl in posts – proper boApril 18, 2006 at 6:37 pm #1070006AcidplumberParticipant
whats the govenment fucking with this week then ct23?April 18, 2006 at 7:09 pm #1070010Negroponte also told TIME that three dozen or so of the worst al-Qaeda terrorists held in secret CIA prisons are likely to remain in captivity as long as the “war on terror continues.” He added, “These people are being held. And they’re bad actors. And as long as this situation continues, this war on terror continues, I’m not sure I can tell you what the ultimate disposition of those detainees will be.” Negroponte’s comments appear to be the first open acknowledgement of the secret U.S. detention system and the fact that captives such as Khalid Shaikh Mohammad — involved in Sept. 11 or other major attacks on U.S. interests around the world — may be held indefinitely.
Even more farcical was the fact that the “investigation” into the July 7 bombings was hindered when it was discovered the CCTV cameras on the bus that blew up were not working.
Charlie Sheen Says Media Complicit In 9/11 Cover-Up
Response to Kimmel appearance betrays unparalleled willful ignorance
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | April 17 2006
Charlie Sheen has hit back against the predictable establishment response to his Jimmy Kimmel Live appearance by asking why they failed to address the two core issues he mentioned, the five frames of the Pentagon footage and Building 7. Sheen accuses the media of being complicit in the 9/11 cover-up.
The response to Charlie Sheen’s Friday night appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live (VIDEO) again underscores the blind ignorance of the establishment media in their treatment of the 9/11 subject as well as their blatant deception in claiming Sheen has little public support.
Sheen limited his focus to just two issues, the Pentagon and Building 7.
“There are two areas,” said Sheen, “Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon. Don’t listen to me, do your own research,” Sheen stated on the ABC show.
But every single hit piece has failed to adequately discuss either.
According to recent developments in the Moussaoui trial, family members were shown video of the impact of Flight 77. Why is that footage so sensitive that it has not been released publicly? Or was the footage just a repeat of the five amorphous frames that have provoked so many questions?
The National Ledger website has so relentlessly attacked Sheen that it looks like they are now doing so only to try and attract attention. Despite this, today’s tirade fell flat on its face again in refusing to address the main tenets of Sheen’s argument. The writer also confused Charlie Sheen with Tom Cruise, as can be seen from the screenshot below, hardly a mistake that would fill one with confidence as to their focus and journalistic credibility.
While attempting to state that Sheen is trying to come forward with a mea culpa The Ledger can’t even keep straight that its Sheen not Tom Cruise who is brave enough to ask questions about 9/11.
Furthermore, The Ledger cites the cockpit recordings of Flight 93 as evidence to debunk Sheen’s claims. For a start Sheen has not even discussed Flight 93 or used it to illustrate his argument. Secondly, the Flight 93 cockpit recordings, assuming they are genuine, contradict the official contention that the ‘let’s roll’ heroes bravely crashed the plane, preventing it from finding a higher profile target.
This completely contradicts a speech made by President Bush on May 8 2002.
“I think the most telling event on September 11th, and one that I hope a lot of people remember, is what happened on Flight 93. Basically, what I’m saying is, it’s important to serve something greater than yourself in life. It’s important to serve a call greater than yourself and a cause greater than yourself. Flight 93, we had average citizens flying across the country, and they realized their plane was fixing to be used as a weapon on the Nation’s Capital. They called their loved ones on the phone. They said a prayer and told them they loved them, said a prayer, and they drove the plane in the ground to serve something greater than themselves. That’s the American spirit I know. That’s that sense of sacrifice that makes this country so strong.”
If you believe the Flight 93 transcripts the only people who drove the plane into the ground were the hijackers.
The Ledger tries to slam Sheen, stating:
“No one cares if Charlie Sheen has questions.”
“But when you make outrageous claims with nothing more than propaganda to back up said claims – expect to be attacked. Other people get to speak as well – and Sheen needs to understand that.”
“Sheen is allowed to have his questions – and folks in the media are allowed to challenge him and indeed label him a tin foil hat wearing “Hollywood nut.”
He brought nothing serious to the table to debate.
Quite to the contrary, Sheen asserted only (as he has ever done) that he has questions about things that “don’t make sense,” and wants to see more attention given to these questions that many people share. His statements during the Jimmy Kimmel interview were not a mea culpa, but a hardline stance reclaiming his right as an American citizen to question authority.
Despite what many might have you believe about Sheen, the people are with him.
Charlie Sheen personally gave his response to Jim Roberts’ Ledger piece.
“Hey Jim – Why did you so carefully yet obviously OMIT my two specific focal points, Building 7 and the 5 frames from the Pentagon, in your story, despite numerous quotes from the Kimmel piece interwoven throughout?”
“Like so many others, chances are you took a look for yourself and realized the evidence is far too credible. I’m all for an honest debate. However, manipulating or distorting such irrefutable data prevents anything of the sort from occurring. There is nothing “tiny” about this movement. Do a little more research before you spew forth such blatant inaccuracies.”
“It’s actually inspiring to witness this level of media arrogance and complicity – it so clearly illustrates a radical and baseline climate of fear. Fear perhaps, of the TRUTH… I wish you well in your travels.”
We will wait and see if The Ledger even publishes Sheen’s rebuttal, something the Guardian refused to do.
The most egregious of the spin appears on Slashfilm where the site states that, “The public attacked Sheen after asking questions about 9/11 on a national radio show. The general viewpoint being that he was just an actor, what right does he have to make such accusations.”
While Sheen does indicate that he was attacked for his comments during the interview, it was in fact the media that attacked his brave stance and not the public. The public’s outcry, as measured by several polls conducted by CNN and others, had been very much in favor of Sheen and his willingness to put his career on the line and speak truth to power. Even during the interview on the Jimmy Kimmel Live program, the crowd responded with a powerful and sustained round of applause when Sheen again raised his questions about 9/11.
In an article recently published by Scripps-Howard News Service, Journalist Betsy Hart notes the incredible response she first received when covering the Sheen 9/11 story, “I started getting inundated with e-mails. They implored or demanded that I consider Sheen’s “evidence” of a government conspiracy.”
This is a cheap attempt to skew the incredible, positive response from people all over the country who viewed Sheen’s statements on 9/11 as a courageous and important act.
Far from becoming a shrinking violet, Charlie Sheen has now gone one step further in his defiant stance on 9/11. After the media failed to respond to his invitation to challenge him on the facts, he is now pointing a finger at the media for collaborating in the cover-up of 9/11.
“The mainstream media’s blatant attempt to suffocate and censor my specific points of interest i.e. Building 7 and the five frames from the Pentagon, illustrates their transparent and desperate role as accomplices to the 9/11 cover up,” Sheen told Alex Jones.
Proof of this censorship has again come from Google’s quarters, following their refusal to index any articles concerning Sheen’s appearance on The Alex Jones Show, a policy that was later reversed, we have again run into a black hole in terms of Google’s failure to index Infowars or Prison Planet articles concerning Sheen’s appearance on Kimmel (listing only a temporary cache of our main index pages).
Will Google continue to impose a blackout or, as in other cases, will they relent under pressure?
Will the mainstream attack dogs continue to whimper like poodles or will they actually engage Sheen in a real debate?April 18, 2006 at 11:13 pm #1070002DJ KhemicaParticipantCol wrote:some tithead was DOSing the server and the host got pissed off so they need to find a new host
wont be back until mid next week earliest
When SJ find a new host, does that mean we all have to re-register and we lose all our post counts from before the site went down?
Don’t mean to ask a dumb question, but I don’t have a scooby about computer stuff…:neutral: and I was just wondering if that would be the case.April 18, 2006 at 11:21 pm #1069995ColParticipantDJ Khemica wrote:When SJ find a new host, does that mean we all have to re-register and we lose all our post counts from before the site went down?
Don’t mean to ask a dumb question, but I don’t have a scooby about computer stuff…:neutral: and I was just wondering if that would be the case.
PM Jon Tooth
he’s the man with the answers :laugh_at:April 19, 2006 at 6:47 am #1070013andy ridgewayParticipant
it wouldn’t be the first time a rave website has voluntarily taken itself offline over a bank holiday, in order to ensure the nobends who feel obliged to blab about everything on the net, are denied…
🙂April 19, 2006 at 6:54 am #1069990andy ridgeway wrote:it wouldn’t be the first time a rave website has voluntarily taken itself offline over a bank holiday, in order to ensure the nobends who feel obliged to blab about everything on the net, are denied…
For sure but it’d be back by now obviously if it had been…April 19, 2006 at 7:48 am #1070007Jon_toothParticipantCol wrote:PM Jon Tooth
he’s the man with the answers :laugh_at:
You git, Col.
No one will lose their accounts, or their posts – everything is backed up.
They are just moving everything to another server.April 19, 2006 at 8:16 am #1070014andy ridgewayParticipantSite wrote:For sure but it’d be back by now obviously if it had been…
unless they fancied a break from it for a couple of days
just a thought.
the timing seems a bit how you say, synchronicitous otherwise?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.