- This topic has 632 replies, 93 voices, and was last updated February 1, 2010 at 9:51 pm by 1984.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 3, 2007 at 9:39 am #1114824
meatballParticipantIve probly missed summin but why is the juice down?
August 3, 2007 at 9:39 am #1135162meatballParticipantIve probly missed summin but why is the juice down?
August 3, 2007 at 9:40 am #1114940clityParticipantmeatball wrote:Ive probly missed summin but why is the juice down?out of hand noncing, freeway’s gone nutz
August 3, 2007 at 9:40 am #1135290clityParticipantmeatball wrote:Ive probly missed summin but why is the juice down?out of hand noncing, freeway’s gone nutz
August 3, 2007 at 9:47 am #1114826meatballParticipantclity wrote:out of hand noncing, freeway’s gone nutzi thought it had something to do with that. hes dodgy.. :you_crazy
August 3, 2007 at 9:47 am #1135163meatballParticipantclity wrote:out of hand noncing, freeway’s gone nutzi thought it had something to do with that. hes dodgy.. :you_crazy
August 3, 2007 at 9:52 am #1114794L KParticipantmeatball wrote:i thought it had something to do with that. hes dodgy.. :you_crazyLively merked Squatjuice.
Facebook Group wrote:We all thought he wouldn’t do it but he did. For the 7th day was upon us, and Lively did cast his power across t’internet, and solemley merk those who had chortled at his rubbish trollsAugust 3, 2007 at 9:52 am #1135129L KParticipantmeatball wrote:i thought it had something to do with that. hes dodgy.. :you_crazyLively merked Squatjuice.
Facebook Group wrote:We all thought he wouldn’t do it but he did. For the 7th day was upon us, and Lively did cast his power across t’internet, and solemley merk those who had chortled at his rubbish trollsAugust 3, 2007 at 9:55 am #1114941clityParticipantdid he get his man though or was it just a wild merking of anyone with an sj tag???
August 3, 2007 at 9:55 am #1135292clityParticipantdid he get his man though or was it just a wild merking of anyone with an sj tag???
August 3, 2007 at 9:58 am #1114761andy ridgewayParticipantin answer to the original question on this thread, squatjuice is in the eye of the beholder.
if you take it too seriously, it might bend your mind or something.
i have seen it mess with peoples’ heads many times 😮
August 3, 2007 at 9:58 am #1135092andy ridgewayParticipantin answer to the original question on this thread, squatjuice is in the eye of the beholder.
if you take it too seriously, it might bend your mind or something.
i have seen it mess with peoples’ heads many times 😮
August 3, 2007 at 10:02 am #1114942clityParticipantjust look at the babtist
August 3, 2007 at 10:02 am #1135293clityParticipantjust look at the babtist
August 3, 2007 at 10:06 am #1114935tiltingParticipantI’ve never been offended by anything other than the poor grammar and spelling on SJ.
Not too keen on dead cats and coprophelia and all that, but then I’ve been on the internet a long time. Ogrish, Rotten.com, Goatse and what have you.
I like SJ. Though I do wish some people would grow up a bit. DC was the nuts back in the day though. I first became a computer nerdling when I found out about DC.
August 3, 2007 at 10:06 am #1135286tiltingParticipantI’ve never been offended by anything other than the poor grammar and spelling on SJ.
Not too keen on dead cats and coprophelia and all that, but then I’ve been on the internet a long time. Ogrish, Rotten.com, Goatse and what have you.
I like SJ. Though I do wish some people would grow up a bit. DC was the nuts back in the day though. I first became a computer nerdling when I found out about DC.
August 3, 2007 at 10:24 am #1114756T.I.GParticipantlittle luke wrote:I think, well the impression I get is, that on this site people aren’t themselves – they pussyfoot around each other trying not to cause offence or upset.And for the people that say “you can’t get an intelligent conversation on SJ” – have you tried? I’ve had/read many an interesting/intelligent/factual conversation on there.
On here you can’t get a conversation full stop, cos it’s so damn slow moving.Precisely…
The amount of traffic that SJ has gives it a hell of a lot more depth & variety of people and topics – inevitably resulting in a lot of tripe and plenty of nonces as well as the ‘decent’ conversations that take place… but when i’m bored at work sometimes i’d rather have a laugh at some stupid pics, some ridculous arguements and some utter wrongness rather than having a boring chat about current affairs with a couple of overly PC wankers trying to be clever (PV)
Plus, half of the SJ masses actually know each other which on most days makes it the best Soap opera running – this obviously won’t appeal if you are an ad hoc visitor from PartyVibe
August 3, 2007 at 10:24 am #1135086T.I.GParticipantlittle luke wrote:I think, well the impression I get is, that on this site people aren’t themselves – they pussyfoot around each other trying not to cause offence or upset.And for the people that say “you can’t get an intelligent conversation on SJ” – have you tried? I’ve had/read many an interesting/intelligent/factual conversation on there.
On here you can’t get a conversation full stop, cos it’s so damn slow moving.Precisely…
The amount of traffic that SJ has gives it a hell of a lot more depth & variety of people and topics – inevitably resulting in a lot of tripe and plenty of nonces as well as the ‘decent’ conversations that take place… but when i’m bored at work sometimes i’d rather have a laugh at some stupid pics, some ridculous arguements and some utter wrongness rather than having a boring chat about current affairs with a couple of overly PC wankers trying to be clever (PV)
Plus, half of the SJ masses actually know each other which on most days makes it the best Soap opera running – this obviously won’t appeal if you are an ad hoc visitor from PartyVibe
August 3, 2007 at 10:31 am #1114936tiltingParticipantT.I.G wrote:a boring chat about current affairs with a couple of overly PC wankers trying to be clever (PV)I don’t come on here much at all, so I shouldn’t comment too much. But I did see this little gem further up this very thread:
boothy wrote:quite a few of them are annoyingly conservative as well… which says more about boothy (and then possibly PV) than about the people on SJ, I reckon. He does go on to say something about racism though, which is somewhat more defensible.
But anyway, it’s all good. This is a nice place, and thanks PV for letting us squat here for a few days! (See we can be nice too)
August 3, 2007 at 10:31 am #1135287tiltingParticipantT.I.G wrote:a boring chat about current affairs with a couple of overly PC wankers trying to be clever (PV)I don’t come on here much at all, so I shouldn’t comment too much. But I did see this little gem further up this very thread:
boothy wrote:quite a few of them are annoyingly conservative as well… which says more about boothy (and then possibly PV) than about the people on SJ, I reckon. He does go on to say something about racism though, which is somewhat more defensible.
But anyway, it’s all good. This is a nice place, and thanks PV for letting us squat here for a few days! (See we can be nice too)
August 3, 2007 at 11:12 am #1114713Mr FixxyParticipantsquat juice is gonzo
August 3, 2007 at 11:12 am #1135039Mr FixxyParticipantsquat juice is gonzo
August 3, 2007 at 11:42 am #1114757T.I.GParticipantMr Fixxy wrote:squat juice is gonzoHaha spot on ;D
August 3, 2007 at 11:42 am #1135088T.I.GParticipantMr Fixxy wrote:squat juice is gonzoHaha spot on ;D
August 3, 2007 at 11:51 am #1114758partyanimalParticipantspark_plug wrote:innit! thats why i did this post. id hate to be at a free party with folk like thatHahaha. I don’t think you’ll ever be able to go anywhere without people like that. It is modern society I’m afraid – blame the government.raaa
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.