- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated January 29, 2006 at 10:27 pm by PaulM.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2006 at 10:48 pm #1037147
For non techies this is a type of printer optimised for photographic printing.
The output is more durable and should not fade when exposed to UV light like inkjet printing, also the colour rendition is supposed to be better (despite the limitations of digital cameras and the colour conversions.._
they work by melting fine particles of ink on to the paper and then coating it with some gloss stuff I’ve been looking at these in Jessops. They’ve been around for some time but have hitherto been ridiculolusly expensive – now you can pick them up for a cost cheaper than a decent inkjet or laser!
The have lower running costs than inkjets (25-27p per print) and output standard 6″ x 4″ photos – they are the same quality as the photo printing on your average postcard or old skool film photos from a minilab.
What is even better is that you can connect your PC to the machine as well and print optimised photos – and of course you don’t have to pay for the duff photos like with traditional film cameras. (I am particularly harsh on myself when putting photos up for public viewing as opposed to just backing up chips, I will only print/upload about 33% of the pics I have shot, you get a lot of NG (no good) pics when shooting at raves for various reasons (light conditions and/or being moosed)
These seem like a brilliant way of sharing photos but dealing with the security problems – as much fun as gallery photos are nothing IMO beats having a real print or a photo album to look at or show your friends (particularly those who don’t have computers) and its so much more secure…. – between all of us in our crew I’m sure we could spare a few quid for media costs for those who want extra copies…
anyone else got one of these machines already, or used one at work/college?
I am looking at the Canon models as I need one that reads memory cards (I haven’t got Pictbridge on my camera as it was built before this was invented), also media should be easy to get… anyone know of any better models?
January 26, 2006 at 12:04 pm #1068508picked up one of these yesterday – (canon CP710) – the quality from them is amazing – way better than any inkjet printer. Turns out that the CP710 won’t read xD cards without an adaptor – Had to re-flash the firmware on my camera to enable PictBridge (a method of printing without using a
computer)The device can also be connected to a computer and comes with photo indexing and editing software – retouching/editing is fairly basic so I will continue to use Photoshop, but I may well abandon Googles Picasa as an
image indexing program (I’m wary of privacy/security) and use the Canon album software instead.pictures are definitely as good as anything I shot in the days of 35mm – OK very slight colour balance anomalies but all digital photography suffers from this, its a trade off for the convenience and privacy
going to have to buy a photo album though for the first time in years..
January 29, 2006 at 10:27 pm #1068509I want 1!!!!
In last job I had use of a fuji mini lab…. I miss being able to print stuff!!!
Have fun with your new toy.I hope to get a copy of Aperture, great for RAW files I will still use good old Photoshop 7, My last job was photoshop boy 5 days a week so I am hocked, just a very cool prog…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
