Ancient Reconstruction, Stonehenge Hospital

“We were born, We were in pain, We were faithful, We were buried.”
-Dr. Garry Denke (1622-1699) historian, antiquarian, dentist

Delivery Room of Life

Birth Canal Theory, Doctor-Dentist Theory, Faith Healing Theory, Cemetery Theory
Perks-Bailey –> Denke –> Wainwright-Darvill –> Pearson

“We are born with two sets of teeth.”

Human teeth begin to form in the embryo, months before a baby is born; they develop from a core of cells in the center of each jaw. This core gradually grows backwards on each side, through the embryo areas, which eventually become hardened as jawbones. Small side branches of cells break off and form tooth buds, one bud for each tooth, making fifty-two (52) buds in all. These develop into tooth shapes, and then start to form the hard dental tissues – enamel, dentine and cement – to become fully formed teeth, embedded in the gums. At birth, all the deciduous teeth are formed, except for their roots.

Two (2) Sets of Teeth

Old Red tongue; Baby tongue: Altar Stone
Bluestone inner teeth; Baby permanent teeth: bluestones
Sarsen outer teeth; Baby primary teeth: sarsens
Circles ‘mouths’; Mother-Baby ‘lips’: bluestones-sarsens

“Expression of the Natural Order or an Unnatural Order?”

SH: An Unnatural Order

1) Death-burial; proof: *corpse-cremation*
2) Healing-faith; proof: *bluestones-cure*
3) Pain-medical; proof: *sarsens-girths*
4) Mother-Baby; proof: *arrangement*

Centre of Stonehenge is the Tongue of a Baby, two Sets of Teeth the Primary and Permanent,
open ‘Mouths’ the ‘Lips’ of Mother-Baby, whose Future is one of Pain and Faith and Death.

“Stonehenge Reconstructed to the Natural Order.”

SH: The Natural Order

1) Mother-Baby; proof: *arrangement*
2) Pain-medical; proof: *sarsens-girths*
3) Healing-faith; proof: *bluestones-cure*
4) Death-burial; proof: *corpse-cremation*

Thus the central message spoken by Old Red Sandstone tongue
of central Stonehenge is we are born with two sets of teeth.

“Stonehenge is a Baby being Born.”

Perks-Bailey Wins!

:biggreen:

Researchers Disagree About Age, Purpose of Stonehenge

I see that Pearson, Pitts and Richards have proven, a) SH did not begin as a cemetery and, b) SH did not begin as a wooden building. No bones were in any of the 56 Aubrey Holes at first, they were full of 56 Pembrokeshire Blue Stone. Those 3000 BC bones had to be buried after Blue Stone was removed. That makes their SH arrival date earlier (3100 BC) coinciding with the Ditch surrounding them. Pearson, Pitts and Richards might consider 3100 BC Pembrokeshire Blue Coal (anthracite) explorers from Preseli Hills marking SH fast silting-in Ditch coal duster with 56 Pembrokeshire Blue Stone (volcanics) who abandoned the duster later which became their cemetery. Wainwright and Darvill might consider this also since that is what happened (great Cursus Coal Cache found). In 7 days Public Consultation of the Future of SH will end. Lt-Col William Hawley and Robert Newall original 1920s evidence (56 ‘X’ Holes) first holding Blue Stone has been confirmed. Scroll Trench was also a Hawley and Newall discovery West-SW of Heelstone (unfinished). Will it be Pearson, Pitts and Richards digging up the Arc Trench ending? or will it be Wainwright and Darvill digging up the Arc Trench ending? SH is just Stonehenge? or SH is Stonehenge Hospital? In 7 days.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia – Scroll Trench

Garry Denke