[Interface]

globalloon wrote:

The Godfather of Soul has died

an a legend with him- !! a man who lived a life that was his own

Respekt – Take it to the Bridge. . JB!

[Interface]

elraveon wrote:

and be prepared. dont advertize freeparties publicly. just because some are getting away withpublicly advertizing at the moment doesent mean that evidence is not being collected to be used at a later date.

the best defence against the license act 2003 is that your party is a private freeparty or gathering and that you take all efforts to make it so. you also need to let all your friends that are invited by what ever private means you use that it is a private affair.

its not a question of big, small, safe or unsafe areas, no one knows whats safe and isnt and if we all avoid certain areas the seemingly safe will soon become unsafe. its not about big either as small parties have fallen foul of this law before and after the amendments. At a big party of several rigs who have been careful to keep it out of the public domain and no one makes statements saying the public were invited, the councils case will not be certain and it is likely to fold because they will not want a long drawn out case they may lose and have to pay the cost. this is how it has worked in the past. the council hope to get pleas of guilty and often drop contested case’s, its not certain thats how it will go but unless we want to see an end to freeparties we need to get everyone on board just in case.
IMO we dont have any choice. mixed messages being sent are a problem and we need an united front so most people get the message

people are still going to party and if they are not to some extent prepared there is going to be a snowball effect and the end to freedom as we know it.
Hmm I think any of this would have a problem in a court of law. .clearly ‘paper flyers’ could be produced by anyone and it would need to be proved that the person/s! who are holding the party were responsible for the production. .and/or distribution . . .likewise if individuals take it upon themselves to use numbers (mob) to inform others. .a court will also need to determine if the ‘person’ holding the party was responsible . . and if ‘that invite was public. . or aimed at certain persons to whom that person knows. . one person can not be held responsible for another individuals actions. . for instance ‘did you know that there is going to be a party next week. .on. .at . . I do not know who it is but a freind of a freind said. . who is responsible? FREEDOM of INFORMATION. . is it so that we must gag each other. . watch out for a labour . . party . . meeting

[Author]

Posts