I think trying to understand the complexity’s of law without the skills to do so is unwise. I think its an interesting perspective that needs to be looked into by people with the skills to do so. I think I need to see the other-side of the argument. I think it boarders on conspiracy theory. I think fighting the system will always be a lost cause, but it depends on weather you value yourself or your goal more. I want to believe he is right, I think I want what he is saying to be true. I would like to know where his definitions come from. He makes assumptions about certain definitions but looks up others. I think he has so much desire to fight the system he would be unlikely to produce evidence that doesn’t support his view. I think what I think is irrelevant.

Very interesting process, have seen a forum about this before but never know what to make of it. If you find out how the lawyers feel about it I would love to know. As the poster says, I want to believe.