Quantcast



PDA

View Full Version : Affluenza


Tank Girl
17-03-2009, 07:10 PM
Just finished a really thought prevoking and interesting book, Affluenza by Oliver James.

anyone else read it?

I thought I'd share some of the key points raised in it and see if anyone has anything to say.....

In My Own Words: AFFLUENZA

Selfish capitalism and mass consumerism are damaging not only the planet but also the people.

ECOLOGISTS MAINLY FOCUS on the damage being done to the planet by advanced industrialisation. I come at the same problem from a different direction: the damage done to our emotional wellbeing by the particular form of advanced industrialisation which many call neo-conservatism or market liberalism, championed by the USA.

My conclusions are the same but via another route: we must declare an end to profligate mass consumerism not only because of the damage to the planet but because of the damage it is doing to people.

To investigate this, in 2004 I embarked on a ‘mind tour’ of seven countries, spending three weeks in each, interviewing citizens of New Zealand, Australia, Singapore, Shanghai, Moscow, Copenhagen and New York. My object was to explore the way in which what I call the “Affluenza Virus” has panned out around the globe.

By ‘Affluenza’ I mean the placing of a high value on money, possessions, appearances and fame.

Studies from samples drawn from fourteen different nations show that people infected with the Virus are significantly more at risk of the commonest mental illnesses – depression, anxiety, addictions and personality disorders.

Affuenza causes illness because it prevents the meeting of true psychological needs, conflating them with wants confected by advertisers and consumerism. A large body of scientific evidence reveals the following reasons why the Virus impairs the meeting of the four needs that most psychologists agree are fundamental.

Insecurity

Constantly comparing your lot with others, especially those who have more than you, is not a prescription for feeling safe. If you are constantly worrying whether you have enough money and the right possessions, or about your appearance, or seeking fame, you are digging the proverbial bottomless pit. You will have a nameless sense that there is always something you should be doing; a free-floating anxiety. You will be depressively running yourself down because you do not do as well as others, moving the goalposts if you do succeed.

At the same time, you may deal with the sense of your inadequacy by falsely building yourself up (exaggerating your wonderfulness in a narcissistic compensation) and by desperate
attention-seeking. To deal with depression, anxiety and exaggerated self-love, you will medicate your unhappiness with booze, drugs and all the myriad other quick fixes that Selfish Capitalism is so adept at confecting and making profits from.

Alienation

The Virus prevents you from meeting your need to connect with family, friends and the wider community by relegating them to a low priority. Unless your family members assist your career, you keep them at a distance. In choosing friends, you are motivated by their use to you, not a desire to be close, emotionally, and to enjoy shared pursuits for fun rather than competition.

Friendship and romantic attachments are so muddled up with professional alliances that they become indistinguishable, as do work and play. You become liable to buy friendship through expensive presents or career gifts (promotions, salary rises) and this may extend to lovers. Your values prioritise selfishness, so you miss out on the large satisfaction to be gained from supporting others and feeling supported.

The consequent lack of intimacy leaves you feeling bored, empty and lonely, promoting depression and anxiety; you compensate with substance abuse, to make you feel better and to introduce thrills into the over-controlled, predictable dreariness.

Feeling incompetent

The same features of the Virus that breed insecurity also impair your need to feel competent. However conventionally successful you are, it is never enough. With your self-focused mindset, there is only one person’s inabilities that can be to blame for this ‘failure’: your own. There is also only one response that you know: try even harder. In a hole, it’s advisable to stop digging. The Virus-stricken, driven on by a powerful sense of their inefficacy, just carry on. As you get deeper and deeper, the sunlight of competence gets weaker and more distant, with an ever-greater threat of the walls of self-criticism and rampant anxiety burying you. With the darkness closing in, you are very vulnerable to anything that will give brief relief. Occasionally, you may even try to end your life.

Inauthenticity

The Virus impedes our need to feel authentic and autonomous by creating a thin, tough, impermeable barrier of false wants between us and our true desires. Most Virus-stricken people are ‘marketing characters’, to a greater or lesser degree. By seeing yourself and others as possessions that can be bought and sold, you cease to experience yourself as a person, but instead as a powerless entity whose value depends wholly on that placed upon it by the market, something that is ultimately beyond your control. Whilst you have the illusion of volition throughout your waking hours, like decisions about who to sack or hire and what to buy or sell, these choices are not real to you: they are part of a virtual reality.This is because the decisions concern matters unconnected with your core, true needs.

This leaves you with the feeling that you are an actor in a play rather than living a real life. The ‘marketing existence’ is an act: it is false, a game you play. Your chameleonism, hyper-competitiveness and Machiavellianism prevent you telling the truth or being told it. If you are ever honest, it is only as part of your manipulativeness – you may use truth-telling sometimes, but to foster trust in order to trick someone, be it a lover or a colleague.

This inauthenticity and lack of autonomy leave you feeling outside yourself, at one remove. It makes you very prone to personality disorders and to any purchasable, snatched snacks of reality, or glimpses thereof, be it through drugs, drink or sex addiction.

ON MY TRAVELS I found this was borne out by my interviewees, but perhaps the most startling information I have to impart comes from armchair research – the results from the World Health Organisation’s ongoing cross-national study of mental illness.

My analysis of its results shows that citizens of English-speaking nations are twice as likely to suffer mental illness as citizens from mainland Western Europe.

The US is by some margin the most mentally ill nation, with 26.4% having suffered in the last twelve months. This is six times the prevalence in Shanghai or Nigeria; a huge discrepancy. Genes do not explain it – studies show that when Shanghaiese or Nigerians move to the US, within a few generations they develop US prevalences.

My contention is that what I term Selfish Capitalism largely explains the greater prevalence among English-speaking nations.

By this I mean a form of political ideology that consumption and market forces can meet human needs of almost every kind. The US is the apotheosis of Selfish Capitalism, Denmark of the Unselfish variety, and English-speaking nations are more infected with the Virus than mainland Western European nations.

To be clear, then, my argument goes like this: Selfish Capitalism infects populations with Affluenza; it fosters mental illness; English-speaking nations are more Selfish Capitalist and therefore more prone to illness.

Its implications hardly need spelling out to an ecologically minded readership. We have to completely rethink the way we organise our societies, shifting from Selfish to Unselfish Capitalist political economics. It is increasingly clear that the people of the world are waking up to the threat posed by global warming. It is my earnest hope that the damage Selfish Capitalism is doing to our mental health will hasten this awakening process, promoting a speedy change towards a much more benign world.
there is a questionaire at the front of the book to define whether you - the reader are already suffering from it, thankfully I came up very low on the scale - but still found it thought prevoking in looking at things that prehaps I need to look at in reassessing my long term goals and a need to focus on what really is important

a smaller version of the books questionaire:

Affluenza Quiz (http://www.randomhouse.co.uk/minisites/affluenza/quiz.htm)


Here are a few more links:

Affluenza by Oliver James - the Blairite virus | open Democracy News Analysis (http://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/2008/01/17/affluenza-by-oliver-james-the-blairite-virus/)

Are you suffering from affluenza? - Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/expathealth/4202539/Are-you-suffering-from-affluenza.html)

Tank Girl
02-04-2009, 02:57 AM
just reading the follow up ' The selfish Capitalist'

interesting stuff if anyone interested you should check em out !


(ps I'm not his PR girl!! Just think he's fantastic!! :laugh_at:)

O-D
02-04-2009, 08:25 AM
You have scored a total of 32 out of a possible 50.
You are severely distressed, and you’re body is racked with the virus!
It is vital that you read Affluenza today!

Woo! More money to spend that I don't have. :laugh_at:

By ‘Affluenza’ I mean the placing of a high value on money, possessions, appearances and fame.

I haven't placed high value on any of them so no idea there.

dougmelv
02-04-2009, 09:02 AM
i must read that it sounds interesting. at least as far back as Jesus the 'evils' of materialism were known. they knew a lot then that we have forgot or don't want to know anymore.
not being a religious nut but still realising the relevance of a lot of the bible to modern life, here is a quote:

But they that are minded to be rich fall into a temptation and a snare and many foolish and hurtful lusts, such as drown men in destruction and perdition (1 Timothy 6:9).

and a good link to the 'paradox of choice', a mini talk at an academic convention about how having too much choice in the developed world leads to reduced happiness.

YouTube - Barry Schwartz: The paradox of choice (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO6XEQIsCoM)

DaftFader
02-04-2009, 09:50 AM
Just finished a really thought prevoking and interesting book, Affluenza by Oliver James.

anyone else read it?
NA BUT I READ SOME OF HIS COOK BOOKS .. HIS RECIPY FOR FISH FINGURE SANDWITCHES AMAZED ME:laugh_at:

dougmelv
02-04-2009, 02:25 PM
16 out of 50....no affluenza for me. yippee! either i'm conquering my inner demons and fending of the mind fuck from the 'machine' or i'm totally deluded..hmm...?

globalloon
02-04-2009, 06:15 PM
12 of 50

Tank Girl
08-04-2009, 12:43 AM
[quote=O-D;317300]Woo! More money to spend that I don't have. :laugh_at:



quote]
you could always go to the local library :wink:

p0ly
08-04-2009, 12:57 AM
cool kids dont go 2 librarys, in Bristol anyway

Tank Girl
08-04-2009, 01:00 AM
cool kids dont go 2 librarys, in Bristol anyway
you could always start a trend?
its good to read :love:

p0ly
08-04-2009, 01:02 AM
i like to read, n i like librarys to!

its just i know O-D hes a proper rudeboy chav

Tank Girl
08-04-2009, 02:30 AM
its just i know O-D hes a proper rudeboy chav
:laugh_at:

DaftFader
08-04-2009, 09:59 AM
You have scored a total of 26 out of a possible 50.
You are moderately distressed, and the virus has already taken hold!
Read Affluenza before your condition gets any worse!

General Lighting
08-04-2009, 06:17 PM
I'm curious to know what the differences were between Shanghai in South China and Singapore as the ancestry of the people there is very similar...

Tank Girl
09-04-2009, 12:01 AM
I'm curious to know what the differences were between Shanghai in South China and Singapore as the ancestry of the people there is very similar...
Just googled a little as I'm pretty useless at answering stuff when i dont have the book in front of me to jog my memory - as I lent it to some one -
but from this blog:

My political blog and other musings: Affluenza by Oliver James (http://vinospoliticalblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/affluenza-by-oliver-james.html)




James’ focus on Singapore is interesting. He does make it sound like Lee Kwan Yew and his regime have created a city-state of worker bees. And it also seems that very few Singaporeans question this. James hypothesises that there is a lot of hidden mental illness and distress among Singaporeans, however I am not sure whether this is bourne out by all the facts.

Measuring this kind of illness and distress is hard. Questions of language and of social stigma mean that the incidence of mental illness between countries is hard to compare. James himself points out that in China many people talk of physical symptoms when they are mentally ill. As such, perhaps it is just that Britain and the US are better at diagnosing mental illness whereas, say, Denmark or China may not be.

James’ section on China is quite interesting. He speaks to people, mainly young women, in Shanghai. He sees them as materialist but, perhaps because China is only just emerging from a state of survival materialism, this materialism doesn’t seem to be making them as unhappy as James thinks people in Britain are. He also makes a lot of the fact that many Chinese were brought up by a loving grandmother. He prefers this to people being looked after by stressed or upset parents and he prefers it to children going to nurseries.

General Lighting
09-04-2009, 12:49 AM
TBH the situation in Singapore and Shanghai seems identical (not at all surprising). There is mental illness in SG but it isn't as prevalent as in the West and is treated using the same techniques as in the West.

The political system there is perhaps best described as a "iron fist handing out a full rice bowl". For those who conform, life is tolerable if not actually enjoyable; I'm sure I read an index of quality of life/happiness where Denmark was at the top, but Singapore came very high indeed, well above Britain....

Grandmothers are as prominent in the culture of Singapore as in Shanghai - as is the concept of family ties. If parents can't look after their own kids due to both working they tend to employ a nanny (usually fillipino or Indonesian) at home rather than have nurseries; although in both Singapore and Malaysia kids are sent to kindergarten at age 3-5 (before junior school) to learn English etc..